Keywords
Innovation Performance
Influencing Factors
higher education
How to Cite
Abstract
Today's fast growth has made it difficult for businesses to react to market demand if they depend only on their capabilities; thus, many businesses seek to collaborate with universities to innovate, enhancing their innovation capacity and competitiveness. In addition, the institution will commercialize its scientific research to accomplish the desired win-win partnership. In this paper, university-enterprise cooperation serves as the context for a review of the impact of various factors on the innovation performance of university-enterprise collaboration. The review is divided into three aspects: cooperation network structure, spatial geography, and social factors.
The inadequacy of engineering students' professional characteristics and technical abilities to match work requirements is a significant issue. For this reason, universities and universities are actively studying and revising the present people training model to discover solutions to an issue in which the university-enterprise partnership model is growing in popularity. University enterprise collaboration method may meet the purpose of staff training, increase the vitality and strength of operating universities, and raise the level and quality of operating universities and education. Simultaneously, it will help satisfy the demands of social and economic growth, supply firms with high-quality resources, and address the issue of engineering student employment in universities.
References
Ankrah, S., & Omar, A.-T. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408.
Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 559–580.
Barrett, D., Austin, J., & McCarthy, S. (2002). Cross-sector collaboration: Lessons from the International Trachoma Initiative. PUBLIC-PRIVATE, 41.
Bekkers, R., & Freitas, I. M. B. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853.
Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 7–19.
Bower, D. J. (1993). Successful joint ventures in science parks. Long Range Planning, 26(6), 114–120.
Bravi, L., Murmura, F., & Santos, G. (2018). Manufacturing labs: Where new digital technologies help improve life quality. International Journal for Quality Research, 12(4), 957.
Cooke, P. (2004). Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World/Edited by Philip N. Cooke, Martin Heidenreich, Hans-Joachim Braczyk. Psychology Press, London, 442.
Coombs, R., Harvey, M., & Tether, B. S. (2003). Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(6), 1125–1155.
Crespi, G., D’Este, P., Fontana, R., & Geuna, A. (2011a). The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Research Policy, 40(1), 55–68.
Crespi, G., D’Este, P., Fontana, R., & Geuna, A. (2011b). The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Research Policy, 40(1), 55–68.
Cricelli, L., & Grimaldi, M. (2010). Knowledge‐based inter‐organizational collaborations. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Davey, T., Baaken, T., Galán-Muros, V., & Meerman, A. (2011). Study on the cooperation between higher education institutions and public and private organisations in Europe.
De Fuentes, C., & Dutrénit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy, 41(9), 1666–1682.
Dess, G. G., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 446–456.
D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313.
Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. John Wiley & Sons.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A" triple helix" of university-industry-government relations: Introduction. Minerva, 203–208.
European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Youth Opportunities Initiative. European Commission Brussels, Belgium.
Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university–industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309–323.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology, policy, and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Burns & Oates.
Gann, D. (2001). Putting academic ideas into practice: Technological progress and the absorptive capacity of construction organizations. Construction Management & Economics, 19(3), 321–330.
Gertner, D., Roberts, J., & Charles, D. (2011). University‐industry collaboration: A CoPs approach to KTPs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), 625–647.
Giuliani, E., & Arza, V. (2009). What drives the formation of ‘valuable’university–industry linkages?: Insights from the wine industry. Research Policy, 38(6), 906–921.
Guan, J., & Zhao, Q. (2013). The impact of university–industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), 1271–1286.
Haddara, M., & Skanes, H. (2007). A reflection on cooperative education: From experience to experiential learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 8(1), 67.
Hagen, R. (2002). Globalization, university transformation and economic regeneration: A UK case study of public/private sector partnership. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(3), 204–218.
Koehn, D. (2004). What Form of Business Regulation is Workable? Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 23(1/2), 43–63.
Lee, J., & Win, H. N. (2004). Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation, 24(5), 433–442.
Lehrer, M., Nell, P., & Gärber, L. (2009). A national systems view of university entrepreneurialism: Inferences from comparison of the German and US experience. Research Policy, 38(2), 268–280.
Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2004). Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University–industry links for technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 311–326.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.
Mansfield, E., & Lee, J.-Y. (1996). The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, 25(7), 1047–1058.
Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998a). Science-based technologies: University–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851.
Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998b). Science-based technologies: University–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851.
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Oliver, A. L. (2004a). On the duality of competition and collaboration: Network-based knowledge relations in the biotechnology industry. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(1–2), 151–171.
Oliver, A. L. (2004b). On the duality of competition and collaboration: Network-based knowledge relations in the biotechnology industry. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(1–2), 151–171.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., & Hughes, A. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
Philbin, S. (2008). Process model for university‐industry research collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 488–521.
Powers, J. B. (2003). Commercializing academic research: Resource effects on performance of university technology transfer. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 26–50.
Rajalo, S., & Vadi, M. (2017a). University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization. Technovation, 62, 42–54.
Rajalo, S., & Vadi, M. (2017b). University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization. Technovation, 62, 42–54.
Rebelo, M. F., Santos, G., & Silva, R. (2015). Integration of standardized management systems: A dilemma? Systems, 3(2), 45–59.
Russell, J. S., & Stouffer, B. (2003). Leadership: Is it time for an educational change? Leadership and Management in Engineering, 3(1), 2–3.
Segarra-Blasco, A., & Arauzo-Carod, J.-M. (2008). Sources of innovation and industry–university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37(8), 1283–1295.
Shapira, A., & Rosenfeld, Y. (2011). Achieving construction innovation through academia-industry cooperation—Keys to success. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 137(4), 223–231.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.
Toor, S.-R., & Ofori, G. (2008). Leadership versus management: How they are different, and why. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 8(2), 61–71.
Unger, S., & Meiran, W. R. (2020). Student attitudes towards online education during the COVID-19 viral outbreak of 2020: Distance learning in a time of social distance. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 256–266.
Woolgar, L. (2007). New institutional policies for university–industry links in Japan. Research Policy, 36(8), 1261–1274.
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205–1223.
Youtie, J., & Bozeman, B. (2014). Social dynamics of research collaboration: Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights. Scientometrics, 101, 953–962.