Keywords
language learning
ChatGPT
pedagogical authority
digital literacy
How to Cite
Abstract
Artificial intelligence-powered tutors such as ChatGPT, Duolingo, and Grammarly are increasingly integrated into language education, reshaping how authority, correctness, and learning are communicated. While these tools promise efficiency and personalized feedback, their discourse carries implicit ideologies that influence learner identity and perceptions of English.
This study critically examines how AI tutors construct pedagogical authority and embed language ideologies through their responses to learner queries. Using Fairclough’s three-dimensional Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), a corpus of 40 AI-generated responses was analyzed across five functional categories. Findings reveal three dominant patterns: (1) pedagogical authority without dialogue, achieved through modals, imperatives, and praise strategies; (2) linguistic homogenization, privileging Standard English and formal norms while ignoring multilingual variation; and (3) neoliberal framing of learning as an efficiency-driven, individualized process.
These results highlight the non-neutral nature of AI discourse and its alignment with broader technocratic and neoliberal logics in education.
The article concludes with implications for critical digital pedagogy, advocating for reflexive design, multilingual sensitivity, and teacher mediation in AI-supported language learning.
References
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Mitchell, M. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). ACM.
Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Paradigm Publishers.
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder & Herder.
Giroux, H. A. (2004). The terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Routledge.
Gray, J. (2010). The construction of English: Culture, consumerism and promotion in the ELT global coursebook. Palgrave Macmillan.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. Routledge.
Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Pearson Education.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Routledge.
Weller, M. (2020). 25 years of ed tech. Athabasca University Press.
Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. SAGE.
Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. Longman.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27.