Keywords
lesson plan analysis
metafunctions
instruction gap
communicative competence
How to Cite
Abstract
It is believed that teachers in secondary education prioritise correctness in grammar instruction and, in doing so, often overlook the functional potential of language, which is used to negotiate social meaning. The paper aims to investigate the language instruction gap in high school general English language classes by examining the extent to which lesson plans incorporate Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) as a resource for meaning-making (Schleppegrell, 2017). The analysis in this paper applies Halliday’s (1994) metafunctional framework and Nunan’s (1995) analytical outline in order to investigate a corpus of ten lesson plans and their corresponding materials through a qualitative coding scheme. The findings reveal that the main instructions remain dominated by prescriptive rules that treat language as a static object. The analysis indicates that, despite learner-centred classroom management, the interpersonal resources of Mood and Modality remain teacher-controlled, limiting learners’ ability to actively participate in the meaning-making process. The paper concludes that SFG can contribute to bridging the instruction gap by transforming grammar from a set of restrictive rules into a dynamic, functional resource for successful communication.
References
Allwright, D. (1984). Why don’t learners learn what teachers teach? – The interaction hypothesis. In D. M. Singleton & D. G. Little (Eds.), Language learning in formal and informal contexts (pp. 3–18). IRAAL.
Andrews, S. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge University Press.
Banegas, D. L. (2021). Understanding the impact of teaching systemic functional grammar in initial English language teacher education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 492–507.
Burns, A. (2016). Functional approaches to teaching grammar in the second language classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Teaching English grammar to speakers of other languages (pp. 84–105). Routledge.
Coffin, D. (2010). Language support in EAL contexts: Why systemic functional linguistics? NALDIC Quarterly, (Special Issue), 2–5.
Dare, B. (2010). Learning about language: The role of metalanguage. NALDIC Quarterly, (Special Issue), 18–25.
Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2010). From traditional grammar to functional grammar: Bridging the divide. NALDIC Quarterly, (Special Issue), 6–17.
Fauzi, A., & Putra, K. A. (2022). Reconstructing grammar exercises: A systemic functional grammar approach. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 7(2), 397–407.
Gebhard, M. (2010). Teacher education in changing times: A systemic functional linguistics (SFL) perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 797–803.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd Ed.). Edward Arnold.
Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. Bloomsbury.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practices of second language acquisition. Pergamon.
Linares, S. M. S., & Xin, Z. Y. (2020). Language education and systemic functional linguistics: A state-of-the-art review. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 11(2), 234–249.
Martin, R. J. (2000). Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspective (pp. 275–302). Cassell.
Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 133–158.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.
Schleppegrell, M. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(1), 153–170.
Schulze, J. (2015). Academic language, English language learners, and systemic functional linguistics: Connecting theory and practice in teacher education. The CATESOL Journal, 27(1), 109–130.
Snyder, I. (2008). The literacy wars: Why teaching children to read and write is a battleground in Australia. Allen and Unwin.
Ulfiana, La Sunra, & Fauzan, M. M. (2025). The effectiveness of integrating grammar and writing instructions through systemic functional linguistics. Tamaddun, 24(2), 288–296.
Yadav, P. K. (2025). The functional approach to language teaching. International Journal of Research in English, 7(1), 90–92.